@natgeo vs @kimkardashian: Instagram Profiles Compared
A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of National Geographic (@natgeo) and Kim Kardashian (@kimkardashian) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.
National Geographic
@natgeo ✓
Step into wonder and find your inner explorer with National Geographic 🌎
View full stats page →
| @natgeo | Metric | @kimkardashian |
|---|---|---|
| 269.0M | Followers | 344.6M |
| 31.8K | Total Posts | 6.7K |
| 12 | Recent Posts Analyzed | 12 |
| 36.7K | Avg Likes / Post | 1.2M |
| 271 | Avg Comments / Post | 9.0K |
| 37.0K | Avg Engagement / Post | 1.2M |
| 134.5K | Best Post Likes | 2.7M |
| 0% | Engagement Rate (%) | 0% |
| 8.5K | Followers per Post | 51.7K |
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has more Instagram followers, @natgeo or @kimkardashian?
@kimkardashian has more Instagram followers than @natgeo: 344,641,384 vs 269,025,829.
Which account has higher engagement, @natgeo or @kimkardashian?
@kimkardashian has a higher Instagram engagement rate (0.35%) than @natgeo (0.01%).
How is this comparison calculated?
Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.