@blakelively vs @deepikapadukone: Instagram Profiles Compared

A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of Blake Lively (@blakelively) and दीपिका पादुकोण (@deepikapadukone) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.

Verdict: @deepikapadukone leads in 7 of 9 metrics.
@deepikapadukone has 78,364,950 Instagram followers — 37,642,270 more than @blakelively (40,722,680).
@blakelively

Blake Lively

@blakelively

Founder of @blakebrownbeauty 💇‍♀️ @bettybuzz 👼🏼 & @bettybooze 🍸

View full stats page →
@deepikapadukone

दीपिका पादुकोण

@deepikapadukone

View full stats page →
@blakelively Metric @deepikapadukone
40.7M Followers 78.4M
242 Total Posts 655
12 Recent Posts Analyzed 12
460.2K Avg Likes / Post 1.3M
16 Avg Comments / Post 10.2K
460.2K Avg Engagement / Post 1.3M
1.6M Best Post Likes 5.5M
1% Engagement Rate (%) 1%
168.3K Followers per Post 119.6K
Methodology: Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more Instagram followers, @blakelively or @deepikapadukone?

@deepikapadukone has more Instagram followers than @blakelively: 78,364,950 vs 40,722,680.

Which account has higher engagement, @blakelively or @deepikapadukone?

@deepikapadukone has a higher Instagram engagement rate (1.69%) than @blakelively (1.13%).

How is this comparison calculated?

Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Compare these creators to others

@blakelively vs

Or browse more featured creator comparisons →