@zhc vs @dudewithsign: Instagram Profiles Compared

A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of ZHC (@zhc) and Seth (@dudewithsign) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.

Verdict: @zhc leads in 6 of 9 metrics.
@dudewithsign has 7,154,210 Instagram followers — 3,481,815 more than @zhc (3,672,395).
@zhc

ZHC

@zhc βœ“

Baby coming December 2026 πŸ‘ΆπŸ» @munchie.michelle @kaiihsieh Co-founder @munchiepalskits Candy @warheads www.kick.com/zhc

View full stats page β†’
@dudewithsign

Seth

@dudewithsign βœ“

If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything. By @fuckjerry [email protected] πŸ“§ β€’

View full stats page β†’
@zhc Metric @dudewithsign
3.7M Followers 7.2M
832 Total Posts 803
12 Recent Posts Analyzed 12
441.7K Avg Likes / Post 58.6K
3.0K Avg Comments / Post 353
444.7K Avg Engagement / Post 59.0K
1.8M Best Post Likes 188.2K
12% Engagement Rate (%) 0%
4.4K Followers per Post 8.9K
Methodology: Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post Γ— 100.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more Instagram followers, @zhc or @dudewithsign?

@dudewithsign has more Instagram followers than @zhc: 7,154,210 vs 3,672,395.

Which account has higher engagement, @zhc or @dudewithsign?

@zhc has a higher Instagram engagement rate (12.11%) than @dudewithsign (0.82%).

How is this comparison calculated?

Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post Γ— 100.

Compare these creators to others

@zhc vs

Or browse more featured creator comparisons β†’