@emmadeancooks vs @everittmatt: Instagram Profiles Compared

A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of Emma Dean (@emmadeancooks) and Matt Everitt (@everittmatt) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.

Verdict: @everittmatt leads in 8 of 9 metrics.
@everittmatt has 16,037 Instagram followers — 7,885 more than @emmadeancooks (8,152).
@emmadeancooks

Emma Dean

@emmadeancooks

TV host. Food lover. Regular contributor to @eatwell_magazine Masterchef Australia Winner

View full stats page →
@everittmatt

Matt Everitt

@everittmatt

I prefer radio to TV because the pictures are better.

View full stats page →
@emmadeancooks Metric @everittmatt
8.2K Followers 16.0K
905 Total Posts 1.3K
12 Recent Posts Analyzed 12
69 Avg Likes / Post 1.8K
5 Avg Comments / Post 29
74 Avg Engagement / Post 1.8K
106 Best Post Likes 8.9K
0% Engagement Rate (%) 11%
9 Followers per Post 12
Methodology: Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more Instagram followers, @emmadeancooks or @everittmatt?

@everittmatt has more Instagram followers than @emmadeancooks: 16,037 vs 8,152.

Which account has higher engagement, @emmadeancooks or @everittmatt?

@everittmatt has a higher Instagram engagement rate (11.41%) than @emmadeancooks (0.9%).

How is this comparison calculated?

Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Compare these creators to others

@emmadeancooks vs

Or browse more featured creator comparisons →