@tiwasavage vs @kimberly.loaiza: Instagram Profiles Compared

A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of Tiwa Savage (@tiwasavage) and KIM LOAIZA 🇲🇽 (@kimberly.loaiza) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.

Verdict: @kimberly.loaiza leads in 7 of 9 metrics.
@kimberly.loaiza has 36,937,698 Instagram followers — 17,930,099 more than @tiwasavage (19,007,599).
@tiwasavage

Tiwa Savage

@tiwasavage

Energy X Wande Coal X Mavo Out Now

View full stats page →
@kimberly.loaiza

KIM LOAIZA 🇲🇽

@kimberly.loaiza

✨ @jukilopstore ✨ x sɪᴇᴍᴘʀᴇ ʟɪɴᴅᴜʀᴀs

View full stats page →
@tiwasavage Metric @kimberly.loaiza
19.0M Followers 36.9M
199 Total Posts 688
12 Recent Posts Analyzed 12
90.9K Avg Likes / Post 436.2K
2.4K Avg Comments / Post 10.0K
93.3K Avg Engagement / Post 446.2K
650.7K Best Post Likes 848.5K
0% Engagement Rate (%) 1%
95.5K Followers per Post 53.7K
Methodology: Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more Instagram followers, @tiwasavage or @kimberly.loaiza?

@kimberly.loaiza has more Instagram followers than @tiwasavage: 36,937,698 vs 19,007,599.

Which account has higher engagement, @tiwasavage or @kimberly.loaiza?

@kimberly.loaiza has a higher Instagram engagement rate (1.21%) than @tiwasavage (0.49%).

How is this comparison calculated?

Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Compare these creators to others

@tiwasavage vs

Or browse more featured creator comparisons →