@cecil_lu vs @paleyphoto: Instagram Profiles Compared

A side-by-side comparison of the Instagram profiles of 岸本セシル (@cecil_lu) and Matthieu Paley (@paleyphoto) across 9 metrics — followers, engagement rate, average likes, best post, and more. Data is from IGDataHub's continuous data collection.

Verdict: @paleyphoto leads in 7 of 9 metrics.
@paleyphoto has 470,037 Instagram followers — 232,786 more than @cecil_lu (237,251).
@cecil_lu

岸本セシル

@cecil_lu

📍tokyo fashion model / mama👧🏻(7yo) LEEとYouTubeはじめました👇

View full stats page →
@paleyphoto

Matthieu Paley

@paleyphoto

Photographer @natgeo @natgeosociety etc. Prints: [email protected] 🌱 Also: @foodforestportugal • Wellness retreat: @ourlifeinmovement

View full stats page →
@cecil_lu Metric @paleyphoto
237.3K Followers 470.0K
1.5K Total Posts 644
12 Recent Posts Analyzed 12
1.2K Avg Likes / Post 3.4K
12 Avg Comments / Post 138
1.2K Avg Engagement / Post 3.5K
2.9K Best Post Likes 12.5K
0% Engagement Rate (%) 0%
155 Followers per Post 730
Methodology: Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more Instagram followers, @cecil_lu or @paleyphoto?

@paleyphoto has more Instagram followers than @cecil_lu: 470,037 vs 237,251.

Which account has higher engagement, @cecil_lu or @paleyphoto?

@paleyphoto has a higher Instagram engagement rate (0.75%) than @cecil_lu (0.49%).

How is this comparison calculated?

Follower count, post count, and verification status come directly from each Instagram profile. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, engagement rate) are computed from a sample of each account's most recent posts captured by IGDataHub. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / followers per post × 100.

Compare these creators to others

@cecil_lu vs

Or browse more featured creator comparisons →